Property-Owning Democracy is Authoritarian
I’ve argued (ad nauseam) that property-owning democracy is bad because it is unworkable and unjust. I shall now argue that it is authoritarian as well. But before I begin, what do I mean by authoritarian?
The authoritarian, in Jerry Gaus’s terms, is one who
… demands that others [...]
What’s in a Word?
Here, just in time for holiday fun, is some old-fashioned ordinary-language, probably worthless, rumination.
It is often said, when criticizing institutions, that such and such political arrangement systematically hurts the poor and vulnerable. But how is that different from saying that such and such political arrangement hurts the poor and vulnerable? What is the meaning [...]
Property-Owning Democracy is Unjust, Free-Market Fairness is Not
In my last post, in my series on property-owning democracy (POD), I claimed that it is unjust because POD frustrates the realization of Rawls’s (unmodified) two principles of justice. But another more interesting method of showing that PODs are unjust is to show PODs violate a more plausible, modified version of Rawls’s two [...]
The review is part of a symposium I’ve edited for The Journal of Politics; it includes reviews by Sheri Berman, Eric MacGilvray, Robert S. Taylor, and myself, and a reply from John Tomasi.
Tomasi characterizes “market democracy as a research program,” (103) and hopes that it is sufficiently capacious to include those who object to [...]
In a market economy, no one literally distributes the wealth. But that doesn’t mean the concept of social justice is nonsense. Matt explains why:
Property-Owning Democracy is Unworkable
In my last two posts, I explained Rawls’s idea of a property-owning democracy (POD) as elaborated by Thad Williamson and Martin O’Neill in much of their recent work, including this Boston Review piece. In this post, I argue that property-owning democracy is unworkable. I shall make two arguments to [...]
Roderick Long on Race, Gender, Equality and Libertarianism
“We don’t have the right to subordinate other people to our ends or treat them as objects for our uses,” says Roderick Long. “And that is a fundamental kind of equality that I think is at the heart of libertarianism.”
Property-Owning Democracy
IN a recent Boston Review article, philosophers Martin O’Neill and Thad Williamson develop and defend Rawls’s ideal economic regime, property-owning democracy. Given that these two authors have recently put out an anthology devoted to working out the details of this ideal, I thought it would be worthwhile to offer a [...]
“Aiming at justice” and justice
Well, its been a while. Having caught up with a few projects (at least for the moment), I thought I’d wet my feet once again in the blogosphere with this, inspired by discussing John Tomasi’s Free Market Fairness with graduate students, especially Travis Holmes.
High liberals, Tomasi claims, believe that “To ‘realize’ justice as fairness, [...]
Hasnas on Tomasi
The latest issue of Cato’s Regulation magazine contains a brief but worthwhile review of John Tomasi’s Free Market Fairness. The review, written by John Hasnas of Georgetown University, is generally sympathetic, but is quite critical on a few points in ways that I suspect will resonate with those of [...]
Categories
- A Bleeding Heart History of Libertarian Thought
- Academic Philosophy
- Announcements
- Blog Administration
- Book/Article Reviews
- Consequentialism
- Current Events
- Democracy
- Economics
- Exploitation
- Left-libertarianism
- Liberalism
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Links
- Rights Theory
- Rothbard's Ethics of Liberty
- Social Justice
- Symposium on Free Market Fairness
- Symposium on Left-Libertarianism
- Symposium on Libertarianism and Land
- Toleration
- Uncategorized
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
Blogroll
- Agitator
- Art Carden
- Austro-Athenian Empire
- Cafe Hayek
- Cato @ Liberty
- Cato Unbound
- Center for a Stateless Society
- Circle Bastiat
- Coordination Problem
- Crooked Timber
- EconLog
- Economic Thought
- Economics and Ethics
- Free Banking
- George H. Smith – Excursions
- Glen Greenwald
- Julian Sanchez
- Knowledge Problem
- League of Ordinary Gentlemen
- LiberaLaw
- Libertarianism.Org
- Liberty and Power
- Liberty Law Blog
- Liberty Unbound
- Marginal Revolution
- Matt Yglesias
- Megan McArdle
- Moorfield Storey
- Mutualist Blog
- Natural Rights Libertarian
- New APPS
- Overcoming Bias
- PEA Soup
- Pileus
- PopeHat
- Public Reason
- Rad Geek People's Daily
- Reason: Hit & Run
- Skeptical Libertarian
- Social Rationalist
- Students for Liberty
- The Independent Institute Beacon
- Tom Palmer
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Will Wilkinson
Tags
academic philosophy anarchism bleeding heart libertarianism Bryan Caplan charity children coercion corporatism crooked timber economic liberty education eudaimonism exploitation feminism free market fairness Friedrich Hayek Herbert Spencer history inequality John Locke John Rawls John Tomasi left-libertarianism liberalism libertarianism liberty marriage Murray Rothbard non-aggression principle Occupy Wall Street poverty property-owning democracy property rights public justification public reason Robert Nozick Ron Paul self-ownership social contract theory social justice Students for Liberty sweatshops Thick Libertarianism war workRecent Comments
- Tedd on A Questionable Argument for Paternalistic Legislation
- Sean II on Links
- Fallon on Links
- Tedd on A Questionable Argument for Paternalistic Legislation
- Sean II on Links


