Critics of same-sex marriage often argue that its defenders are guilty of seeking to “redefine” marriage.
It is true that the term “marriage” has traditionally been applied, for the most part, to heterosexual unions specifically (though often polygamous ones, a fact such critics persistently pretend to overlook). But it is also true that the term [...]
A Paradox and 2 Sorts of Liberalism
In Kevin’s recent post, responding to Jessica’s prior post, Kevin discusses what he calls “the paradox of toleration.” There are actually multiple paradoxes of toleration. Arguably, the most important of these is what we call “the paradox of liberalism” (remember we are using “liberal” with its classic meaning, not [...]
Moral Fanaticism and the Hope of Public Reason: A Reply to Flanigan
My friend and co-blogger, Jessica Flanigan, threw down the gauntlet last week over the truth of public reason liberalism, the popular version of liberal political theory that I used to argue against the contraception mandate. This is my reply.
Public reason liberalism (PRL) holds that a coercive law L is justified [...]
What follows was my weekly column at the Freeman this week and I reprint it here as the subject matter might be of interest to BHL types. Enjoy!
Libertarians have a number of public relations problems. Some are the result of people not understanding our ideas. Others, however, are our own fault: [...]
A Defense of the Unreasonable
I really enjoyed Kevin’s recent discussion of the ‘contraception mandate,’ particularly because his posts highlight a deep and important divide in political philosophy that I think merits attention. Kevin sketches the following view about whether a law is justified:
“(The) principle of public justification (PPJ) …holds that a coercive law L is only justified [...]
A Possible BHL position on Humanitarian Aid
Assume there is a moral principle indicating that states (or citizens therein) that have adequate (or better) resources have an obligation to aid those in states that have inadequate resources. Such a principle has been defended, of course (see, for example, Charles Beitz’ 1979, esp. 136-143). Importantly, even if such a [...]
The Green Button Test
This is a brief reaction to Andrew’s post and comments.
1) Toleration is a funny concept. We tolerate an idea or practice we disapprove of. One possibility is to say that to tolerate X is to refuse to use force to change X. But this, I think, is incorrect. I don’t tolerate the subjection of [...]
It’s interesting discussing toleration. The ideas that people have about it are many and varied. One that comes up especially often, couched in a variety of terms, goes something like this: “toleration is a sort of wishy-washy multi-culturalist policy, but its basically a good thing because people should not judge others.”
There are 2 problems [...]
Judging States
One way to define liberalism, as I have previously indicated here is by reference to the normative principles of toleration it is committed to (as I suggested in that previous post). I think that such a definition also allows a clear way to judge states. Let me spell out what I mean.
I [...]
I've noticed, in a few comments on different posts, that some readers are attracted to views that reject the existence of objectivity. Roughly speaking, something is objectively true if its truth does not depend on any particular person as knower or any particular group as knowers. Put differently, if proposition P is objectively true, it [...]
Follow us on Twitter
Categories
- A Bleeding Heart History of Libertarian Thought
- Academic Philosophy
- Announcements
- Blog Administration
- Book/Article Reviews
- Consequentialism
- Current Events
- Democracy
- Economics
- Exploitation
- Left-libertarianism
- Liberalism
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Rights Theory
- Social Justice
- Symposium on Libertarianism and Land
- Toleration
- Uncategorized
Blogroll
- Agitator
- Art Carden
- Austro-Athenian Empire
- Cafe Hayek
- Cato @ Liberty
- Cato Unbound
- Center for a Stateless Society
- Circle Bastiat
- Coordination Problem
- Crooked Timber
- E.D. Kain
- EconLog
- Economics and Ethics
- Ethics for Adversaries
- Free Banking
- George H. Smith – Excursions
- Glen Greenwald
- Julian Sanchez
- Knowledge Problem
- League of Ordinary Gentlemen
- LiberaLaw
- Libertarianism.Org
- Liberty and Power
- Liberty Law Blog
- Liberty Unbound
- Marginal Revolution
- Matt Yglesias
- Megan McArdle
- Moorfield Storey
- Mutualist Blog
- Natural Rights Libertarian
- New APPS
- Overcoming Bias
- PEA Soup
- Pileus
- Public Reason
- Reason: Hit & Run
- Students for Liberty
- The Independent Institute Beacon
- Tom Palmer
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Will Wilkinson
Our Books
Guido Pincione, Fernando R. Tesón: Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation: A Theory of Discourse Failure
James Stacey Taylor: Stakes And Kidneys: Why Markets In Human Body Parts Are Morally Imperative (Live Questions in Ethics and Moral Philosophy)Tags
academic philosophy anarchism Ayn Rand bleeding heart libertarianism Bryan Caplan charity children civic virtue contractualism corporatism cultural libertarianism current events economic liberty eudaimonism exploitation feminism Frederic Bastiat free market fairness Free Trade Friedrich Hayek Herbert Spencer history inequality John Locke John Rawls left-libertarianism liberalism libertarianism marriage Murray Rothbard New in the Journals Occupy Wall Street poverty property rights public reason Robert Nozick Ron Paul self-ownership social contract theory social justice Students for Liberty sweatshops symbolic politics Thick Libertarianism warRecent Comments





















