Natural Rights and Natural Stuff
Since there are many different sorts of approaches to libertarianism – including many different sorts of moral approaches – there are many different sorts of routes to the topic of “Libertarianism and Land.” Fortunately, the implicit context of this symposium is the natural rights approach to libertarianism – which I would (elsewhere) argue is the [...]
On p. 272 of Anarchy, State and Utopia, Nozick writes the following:
Economically well-off persons desire greater political power, in a nonminimal state, because they can sue this power to give themselves differential economic benefits. Where a locus of such power exists, it is not surprising that people attempt to use it for their own [...]
Today we will be discussing the contributions of Robert Nozick to modern social philosophy and political economy. It is my impression, perhaps wrong, that most philosophers and political theorists focus on Nozick’s “rights theory” and his rights-based arguments against Rawlsian social justice.
I don’t deny that such a reading makes sense, but I [...]
Adam, a Native American, and George, an American of European descent, encounter each other on the street. Adam sees that George is carrying a shiny new Ipad 3. So Adam clubs George over the head with a stick and takes it.
George: “Ow! Give that back!”
Adam: “No.”
George: “But that’s mine! You just took [...]
John Tomasi’s Free Market Fairness
John Tomasi’s new book, Free Market Fairness, is scheduled for release this week. I read this book in draft form almost exactly a year ago, when John was out in San Diego for a Liberty Fund conference I was running on Classical Liberalism in Contemporary Political Philosophy. A few of us (including [...]
Against Utilitarianism and Self-Ownership Defenses of Libertarianism
Perhaps the best argument against utilitarian and self-ownership defenses of libertarianism is this:
Utilitarianism is too consequence-sensitive and self-ownership is too consequence-insensitive.
It’s a simple criticism. Utilitarianism is well-known for being too insensitive to matters besides utility, such as the separateness of persons (as Rawls made famous in TJ). Utilitarianism [...]
More on Talents
This post is a continuation of the long and rich conversation generated by my previous post. Some of the comments below reiterate, perhaps less artfully, some of the points already made.
I agree with Rawls’s defenders that by asserting that “society owns talents“ he does not, and could not, mean that the state can force [...]
A Premise Questioned
I haven’t been posting lately because I’ve been working on topics not directly related to the theme of the blog.
I am reading G.A. Cohen’s Rescuing Justice and Equality. It is, like everything Jerry wrote, stimulating, original, and clever. The main claim in the book is that the Rawlsian argument for the [...]
The Libertarian Critique of Distributive Justice
There’s a common argument that libertarians make against the idea of social or distributive justice. The argument, made by both Robert Nozick and Friedrich Hayek, purports to show not merely that the idea of distributive justice advocated by left-liberals like John Rawls is immoral, but that it is conceptually confused. Asking whether the distribution of [...]
I’m moving out of my house this week, so I won’t have as much time to post. But I wanted to post some clarifying definitions in light of some reader comments.
Here are two (though not the only two) fundamental questions in political philosophy:
1. Is it possible for governments to have legitimacy, and if [...]
Follow us on Twitter
Categories
- A Bleeding Heart History of Libertarian Thought
- Academic Philosophy
- Announcements
- Blog Administration
- Book/Article Reviews
- Consequentialism
- Current Events
- Democracy
- Economics
- Exploitation
- Left-libertarianism
- Liberalism
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Rights Theory
- Social Justice
- Symposium on Libertarianism and Land
- Toleration
- Uncategorized
Blogroll
- Agitator
- Art Carden
- Austro-Athenian Empire
- Cafe Hayek
- Cato @ Liberty
- Cato Unbound
- Center for a Stateless Society
- Circle Bastiat
- Coordination Problem
- Crooked Timber
- E.D. Kain
- EconLog
- Economics and Ethics
- Ethics for Adversaries
- Free Banking
- George H. Smith – Excursions
- Glen Greenwald
- Julian Sanchez
- Knowledge Problem
- League of Ordinary Gentlemen
- LiberaLaw
- Libertarianism.Org
- Liberty and Power
- Liberty Law Blog
- Liberty Unbound
- Marginal Revolution
- Matt Yglesias
- Megan McArdle
- Moorfield Storey
- Mutualist Blog
- Natural Rights Libertarian
- New APPS
- Overcoming Bias
- PEA Soup
- Pileus
- Public Reason
- Reason: Hit & Run
- Students for Liberty
- The Independent Institute Beacon
- Tom Palmer
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Will Wilkinson
Our Books
Guido Pincione, Fernando R. Tesón: Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation: A Theory of Discourse Failure
James Stacey Taylor: Stakes And Kidneys: Why Markets In Human Body Parts Are Morally Imperative (Live Questions in Ethics and Moral Philosophy)Tags
academic philosophy anarchism Ayn Rand bleeding heart libertarianism Bryan Caplan charity children civic virtue contractualism corporatism cultural libertarianism current events economic liberty eudaimonism exploitation feminism Frederic Bastiat free market fairness Free Trade Friedrich Hayek Herbert Spencer history inequality John Locke John Rawls left-libertarianism liberalism libertarianism marriage Murray Rothbard New in the Journals Occupy Wall Street poverty property rights public reason Robert Nozick Ron Paul self-ownership social contract theory social justice Students for Liberty sweatshops symbolic politics Thick Libertarianism warRecent Comments





















