Introduction to the Symposium on John Tomasi’s Free Market Fairness
Welcome to the Bleeding Heart Libertarians symposium on John Tomasi’s Free Market Fairness!
The symposium will run from today, Monday June 11th, through Monday June 18th. Each day this week will feature an essay by one of our lead authors – Deirdre McCloskey, Elizabeth Anderson, Will Wilkinson, Richard Arneson, and Samuel Freeman, in that order. Next Monday, we will run John Tomasi’s response to his critics.
Other participants have been invited to respond with essays of their own, and the regular BHL bloggers might chime in too. But an event like this cannot be a success without the involvement of our readers, and we encourage you to share your thoughts either in the comments thread here or with posts at your own blogs.
So, thanks for stopping by for what we hope to be an exciting and rewarding conversation. Please look below the fold for more information about our participants and their papers.

Deirdre McCloskey teaches economics, history, English, and communication at the University of Illinois at Chicago. A well-known economist and historian and rhetorician, she has written sixteen books and around 400 scholarly pieces on topics ranging from technical economics and statistics to transgender advocacy and the ethics of the bourgeois virtues. Her latest book, Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World (University of Chicago Press, 2010), is the second in a series of four on The Bourgeois Era. With Stephen Ziliak she wrote in 2008, The Cult of Statistical Significance (2008), which criticizes the proliferation of tests of “significance.” Her essay, “Giving a Damn: The Missing Ethics in Political Philosophy,” will run today.
Elizabeth Anderson is Arthur F. Thurnau Professor and John Rawls Collegiate Professor of Philosophy and Women’s Studies at the University of Michigan, where she teaches courses in ethics, social and political philosophy, philosophy of the social sciences, and feminist theory. She is the author of Value in Ethics and Economics (Harvard, 1995) and, most recently, The Imperative of Integration (Princeton, 2010). She is currently working on a project on the history of egalitarianism. Her essay, “Recharting the Map of Social and Political Theory: Where is Government? Where is Conservatism?“ will run on Tuesday.
Samuel Freeman is the Avalon Professor in the Humanities, and Professor of Philosophy and Law at the University of Pennsylvania. He works in social and political philosophy, ethics, and philosophy of law. He is the author of Rawls (Routledge, 2007) and Justice and the Social Contract (Oxford, 2009). He edited the Cambridge Companion to Rawls (2002), as well as John Rawls’s Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy (2007) and his Collected Papers (1999). He is currently working on a manuscript entitled Three Liberalisms: Classical Liberalism, Libertarianism, and the High Liberal Tradition, and on longer term projects on contractarianism, and on distributive justice and the difference principle. His essay, “Can Economic Liberties Be Basic Liberties?“, will run on Wednesday.
Richard Arneson is the Valtz Family Chair in Philosophy at the University of California at San Diego, and a Research Professor at the the Freedom Center and Department of Philosophy at the University of Arizona. He is the author of numerous articles in political philosophy and normative ethics. His current work explores how one might best incorporate a reasonable account of personal responsibility into a broadly egalitarian theory of justice, as well as how consequentialist morality might be developed in a version that is appealing and appropriately responsive to its critics. His essay, “Free Market Fairness: John Rawls or J.S. Mill?“, will run on Thursday.
Will Wilkinson writes about American politics online for The Economist, and about issues in psychology, economics, and philosophy for Big Think. While a research fellow at the Cato Institute, Wilkinson published on Social Security, happiness research, economic inequality, as well as the prospects of liberal-libertarian fusionism. This Fall he will begin an MFA in creative writing at the University of Houston. His essay, “Market Democracy and Dirty Ideal Theory,” will run on Friday.
Categories
- A Bleeding Heart History of Libertarian Thought
- Academic Philosophy
- Announcements
- Blog Administration
- Book/Article Reviews
- Consequentialism
- Current Events
- Democracy
- Economics
- Exploitation
- Left-libertarianism
- Liberalism
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Links
- Rights Theory
- Rothbard's Ethics of Liberty
- Social Justice
- Symposium on Free Market Fairness
- Symposium on Left-Libertarianism
- Symposium on Libertarianism and Land
- Toleration
- Uncategorized
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
Blogroll
- Agitator
- Art Carden
- Austro-Athenian Empire
- Cafe Hayek
- Cato @ Liberty
- Cato Unbound
- Center for a Stateless Society
- Circle Bastiat
- Coordination Problem
- Crooked Timber
- EconLog
- Economic Thought
- Economics and Ethics
- Free Banking
- George H. Smith – Excursions
- Glen Greenwald
- Julian Sanchez
- Knowledge Problem
- League of Ordinary Gentlemen
- LiberaLaw
- Libertarianism.Org
- Liberty and Power
- Liberty Law Blog
- Liberty Unbound
- Marginal Revolution
- Matt Yglesias
- Megan McArdle
- Moorfield Storey
- Mutualist Blog
- Natural Rights Libertarian
- New APPS
- Overcoming Bias
- PEA Soup
- Pileus
- PopeHat
- Public Reason
- Rad Geek People's Daily
- Reason: Hit & Run
- Skeptical Libertarian
- Social Rationalist
- Students for Liberty
- The Independent Institute Beacon
- Tom Palmer
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Will Wilkinson
Tags
academic philosophy anarchism bleeding heart libertarianism Bryan Caplan charity children coercion corporatism crooked timber economic liberty education eudaimonism exploitation feminism free market fairness Friedrich Hayek Herbert Spencer history inequality John Locke John Rawls John Tomasi left-libertarianism liberalism libertarianism liberty marriage Murray Rothbard non-aggression principle Occupy Wall Street poverty property-owning democracy property rights public justification public reason Robert Nozick Ron Paul self-ownership social contract theory social justice Students for Liberty sweatshops Thick Libertarianism war workRecent Comments
- Sean II on Specificity and Overspecificity about “Social Justice”
- good_in_theory on Specificity and Overspecificity about “Social Justice”
- Lebar v. Vallier on Social Justice and More | Bleeding Heart Libertarians on Social Injustice as Emergent Property
- Sean II on Specificity and Overspecificity about “Social Justice”
- MARK_D_FRIEDMAN on Specificity and Overspecificity about “Social Justice”



Pingback: Public Reason · Symposium on John Tomasi’s Free Market Fairness
Pingback: Online Symposium on John Tomasi’s Free Market Fairness « 法哲學、生活與實踐
Pingback: Giving a Damn: The Missing Ethics in Political Philosophy | Bleeding Heart Libertarians
Pingback: Recharting the Map of Social and Political Theory: Where is Government? Where is Conservatism? | Bleeding Heart Libertarians
Pingback: Is Economic Liberty Harmful? | Bleeding Heart Libertarians
Pingback: Can Economic Liberties Be Basic Liberties? | Bleeding Heart Libertarians
Pingback: Free Market Fairness: John Rawls or J. S. Mill? | Bleeding Heart Libertarians
Pingback: Against the Moral Powers | Bleeding Heart Libertarians
Pingback: Some Links
Pingback: Listen Libertarians! Part I | Intellectual Trespassing as a Way of Life
Pingback: Listen Libertarians! Part II | Intellectual Trespassing as a Way of Life
Pingback: Factual Free-Market Fairness | Bleeding Heart Libertarians
Pingback: Listen Libertarians! Part III | Intellectual Trespassing as a Way of Life
Pingback: John Tomasi’s Free Market Fairness | Online Library of Law and Liberty
Pingback: Listen Libertarians! Part IV | Intellectual Trespassing as a Way of Life
Pingback: Listen Libertarians! Concluding Part V | Intellectual Trespassing as a Way of Life
Pingback: Reply to Samuel Freeman: Thick Economic Liberty | Bleeding Heart Libertarians
Pingback: Reply to Deirdre McCloskey: Normative Free Market Fairness | Bleeding Heart Libertarians
Pingback: Reply to Will Wilkinson: Hayekian Free Market Fairness | Bleeding Heart Libertarians
Pingback: Listen Libertarians! Concluding Part V
Pingback: Listen Libertarians! Part IV
Pingback: Listen Libertarians! Part III
Pingback: Listen Libertarians! Part II
Pingback: Listen Libertarians! Part I