“Aiming at justice” and justice
Well, its been a while. Having caught up with a few projects (at least for the moment), I thought I’d wet my feet once again in the blogosphere with this, inspired by discussing John Tomasi’s Free Market Fairness with graduate students, especially Travis Holmes.
High liberals, Tomasi claims, believe that “To ‘realize’ justice as fairness, [...]
First. From the NY Times today: “At the same time that high crop prices are prompting farmers to expand into millions of acres of land once considered unsuitable for farming, Congress is considering expanding a federal insurance program that reimburses farmers for most losses or drops in prices.” (See the article here.) Yes, [...]
Given that we have the government we do, does anyone think we shouldn’t support the Smith-Amash NDAA Amendment?
So far as I can tell, we should be thrilled and grateful Congress has members like Adam Smith (D-WA) and Justin Amash (R-MI). Their amendment would stop the President from indefinitely detaining [...]
Inheritance
I don’t believe the following three arguments are definitive, but I think they are interesting. I have taken them–or the roots of them–from an article on the topic by D.W. Haslett (“Is Inheritance Justified,” PAPA, Vol 15 #2, 1986: 122-155; I don’t know if Haslett would approve of my formulations).
I believe that adults [...]
I had intended my first post-grading post to be about inheritance, but that will wait a bit. Instead, I thought it was time I helped defend BHL a bit.
Stephen Hicks makes “Five quick points against BHL,” all of which I think are pretty much false.
First, Hicks thinks BHL as a “political-philosophical [...]
A Paradox and 2 Sorts of Liberalism
In Kevin’s recent post, responding to Jessica’s prior post, Kevin discusses what he calls “the paradox of toleration.” There are actually multiple paradoxes of toleration. Arguably, the most important of these is what we call “the paradox of liberalism” (remember we are using “liberal” with its classic meaning, not [...]
Bleeding Heart Ideal Theory Libertarianism, Take 2
Say one had a view about what justice is but did not see justice, as understood on that view, instantiated in the world. Would one conclude that one’s view of justice was mistaken? Not necessarily–else everyone on this blog would have to concede being in error. Our shared view–we have differences certainly, but we also [...]
Why I am a Bleeding Heart Ideal Libertarian
I thought I would throw my 2 cents into the current discussion since my view seems to be different than those who have posted so far.
I have to first say something about how I think political philosophy should be done. On this score, I should admit, I am old-fashioned. I believe that one must [...]
Our Family: A Possible Taxonomy
I’ve been delaying posting this for a while, but its time. Its a perhaps idiosyncratic view of where BHL fits into the set of political philosophies nearest to it (in some sense of “nearest”). Some notes follow the taxonomy.
******
1. Liberalism: A family of theories that take liberty and equality to be [...]
States Must Do Bad
Something a little different from my regular posts.
Long ago, Plato asked if we would do better with good rules or good rulers. If we could attain utopia, wherein people are all knowledgable, enlightened, caring, etc., we might be able to make do with having good rulers. We would not need set rules since all [...]
Categories
- A Bleeding Heart History of Libertarian Thought
- Academic Philosophy
- Announcements
- Blog Administration
- Book/Article Reviews
- Consequentialism
- Current Events
- Democracy
- Economics
- Exploitation
- Left-libertarianism
- Liberalism
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Links
- Rights Theory
- Rothbard's Ethics of Liberty
- Social Justice
- Symposium on Free Market Fairness
- Symposium on Left-Libertarianism
- Symposium on Libertarianism and Land
- Toleration
- Uncategorized
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
Blogroll
- Agitator
- Art Carden
- Austro-Athenian Empire
- Cafe Hayek
- Cato @ Liberty
- Cato Unbound
- Center for a Stateless Society
- Circle Bastiat
- Coordination Problem
- Crooked Timber
- EconLog
- Economic Thought
- Economics and Ethics
- Free Banking
- George H. Smith – Excursions
- Glen Greenwald
- Julian Sanchez
- Knowledge Problem
- League of Ordinary Gentlemen
- LiberaLaw
- Libertarianism.Org
- Liberty and Power
- Liberty Law Blog
- Liberty Unbound
- Marginal Revolution
- Matt Yglesias
- Megan McArdle
- Moorfield Storey
- Mutualist Blog
- Natural Rights Libertarian
- New APPS
- Overcoming Bias
- PEA Soup
- Pileus
- PopeHat
- Public Reason
- Rad Geek People's Daily
- Reason: Hit & Run
- Skeptical Libertarian
- Social Rationalist
- Students for Liberty
- The Independent Institute Beacon
- Tom Palmer
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Will Wilkinson
Tags
academic philosophy anarchism bleeding heart libertarianism Bryan Caplan charity children coercion corporatism crooked timber economic liberty education eudaimonism exploitation feminism free market fairness Friedrich Hayek Herbert Spencer history inequality John Locke John Rawls John Tomasi left-libertarianism liberalism libertarianism liberty marriage Murray Rothbard non-aggression principle Occupy Wall Street poverty property-owning democracy property rights public justification public reason Robert Nozick Ron Paul self-ownership social contract theory social justice Students for Liberty sweatshops Thick Libertarianism war workRecent Comments
- spartan2600 on On Robin’s Tenuous Connection between Nietzsche and Hayek
- Pete Sisco on Noticed elsewhere
- good_in_theory on Noticed elsewhere
- David Friedman on Why Talk about “Cartoon Libertarianism”?
- Sean II on Noticed elsewhere


