I’ve hard a hard time understanding why David Friedman and a few other commentators (e.g., Ryan) are so resistant to the account of “social justice” I’ve given. Recall, we’re not here debating whether any theories of social justice are true, but just about what the word means. I think I’ve figured out the issue now.
[...]
[Note: Sorry for the strange lack of paragraph breaks under the fold. I don't know how to fix this.]
David Friedman is worried that the term “social justice” has no definite meaning, despite my claims to the contrary. He has two arguments to this effect:
My definition leaves open a great number of [...]
Consider this a Robin Hanson-style post.
Obama ran on transparency, civil liberties, press freedom, and a less militaristic foreign policy. However, his record is poor. His presidency has been more like a third Bush II term. How should we interpret that?
1. Obama was never sincere.
2. Obama was sincere, but power corrupts.
[...]
Unless we accept Zwolinski and his fellow Bleeding Hearts as the final arbiters in this matter, we will need clearly defined criteria by which we can identify legitimate exceptions to the NAP, and distinguish them from purported exceptions that cannot be justified. Again, it will not do for Zwolinski (or anyone else) to [...]
Having well-informed, sophisticated views about complex issues is an achievement of a sort, and can be admirable. Managing to be rationally agnostic about complex issues is also an achievement, and is admirable. Forming cartoony opinions on complex matters is not admirable. As Edith Watson Schipper says, Reasons are the coin by which we pay for [...]
Zwolinski and Smith have already discovered that much of their disagreement is verbal, rather than substantive. But there are some real differences here.
In an earlier post, Matt wrote:
The NAP clearly implies that it’s wrong for me to shoot you in the head. But, to borrow an example from David Friedman, [...]
I’m participating in a conference on “Markets, Justice, and the Law” at the end of the month. The theme of the conference is in part to examine where the social sciences and political philosophy tend to go wrong. I’m writing a short piece for discussion about some of the pathologies of political philosophy. Here’s my [...]
It seems that every year, someone publishes a book on the moral limits of markets. Peter Jaworski and I will most likely be writing a book responding to these other books, trying to show that most of their objections fail or are misdiagnoses of the problem. Here’s a very abbreviated taste of one topics we’ll [...]
Cartoon libertarians–and there are many of them–usually think the non-aggression principle does a lot of philosophical work. Zwolinski has been arguing the principle is really quite problematic. A flustered George Smith has been writing various responses, none of which seem to have any real force to me. I’ll just comment on a few [...]
Categories
- A Bleeding Heart History of Libertarian Thought
- Academic Philosophy
- Announcements
- Blog Administration
- Book/Article Reviews
- Consequentialism
- Current Events
- Democracy
- Economics
- Exploitation
- Left-libertarianism
- Liberalism
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Links
- Rights Theory
- Rothbard's Ethics of Liberty
- Social Justice
- Symposium on Free Market Fairness
- Symposium on Left-Libertarianism
- Symposium on Libertarianism and Land
- Toleration
- Uncategorized
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
Blogroll
- Agitator
- Art Carden
- Austro-Athenian Empire
- Cafe Hayek
- Cato @ Liberty
- Cato Unbound
- Center for a Stateless Society
- Circle Bastiat
- Coordination Problem
- Crooked Timber
- EconLog
- Economic Thought
- Economics and Ethics
- Free Banking
- George H. Smith – Excursions
- Glen Greenwald
- Julian Sanchez
- Knowledge Problem
- League of Ordinary Gentlemen
- LiberaLaw
- Libertarianism.Org
- Liberty and Power
- Liberty Law Blog
- Liberty Unbound
- Marginal Revolution
- Matt Yglesias
- Megan McArdle
- Moorfield Storey
- Mutualist Blog
- Natural Rights Libertarian
- New APPS
- Overcoming Bias
- PEA Soup
- Pileus
- PopeHat
- Public Reason
- Rad Geek People's Daily
- Reason: Hit & Run
- Skeptical Libertarian
- Social Rationalist
- Students for Liberty
- The Independent Institute Beacon
- Tom Palmer
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Will Wilkinson
Tags
academic philosophy anarchism bleeding heart libertarianism Bryan Caplan charity children coercion corporatism crooked timber economic liberty education eudaimonism exploitation feminism free market fairness Friedrich Hayek Herbert Spencer history inequality John Locke John Rawls John Tomasi left-libertarianism liberalism libertarianism liberty marriage Murray Rothbard non-aggression principle Occupy Wall Street poverty property-owning democracy property rights public justification public reason Robert Nozick Ron Paul self-ownership social contract theory social justice Students for Liberty sweatshops Thick Libertarianism war workRecent Comments
- Theresa Klein on Specificity and Overspecificity about “Social Justice”
- Specificity and Overspecificity about “Social Justice” | Bleeding Heart Libertarians on Social Injustice as Emergent Property
- Specificity and Overspecificity about “Social Justice” | Bleeding Heart Libertarians on Defining Social Justice, Etc.
- martinbrock on Social Injustice as Emergent Property
- Cory Haberkern on Social Injustice as Emergent Property


